2015-VIL-46-SC-DT
Equivalent Citation: [2015] 373 ITR 526 (SC)
Supreme Court of India
Civil Appeal Nos. 6353 6360 of 2004.
Date: 15.04.2015
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Vs
DHANALEKSHMI BANK LTD.
Guru Krishna Kumar, Senior Advocate (Arijit Prasad, Ms. Rekha Pandey, Prashant,Ms. Gargi Khanna, Mrs. Anil Katiyar and B. V. Balaram Das, Advocates, with him) for the appellant
Sanjay Kunur, Ramesh Keswani and R. N. Keshwani, Advocates, for the respondent
BENCH
A. K. SIKRI AND ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.
JUDGMENT
1. Penalty of Rs. 10,61,698 imposed by the Reserve Bank of India for committing violation of provisions of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, was claimed as business expenditure by the respondent-bank. The aforesaid amount was in respect of the assessment years 1984-85 to 1991-92, i.e., for 8 years.
2. It is clear from above that the total amount is Rs. 10,00,000 and odd that too relating to a period of 8 years.
3. Having regard to the pettiness of this amount, we are not inclined to consider the issue on the merits. It is more so when learned counsel for the respondent has pointed out that against a similar kind of judgment passed in CIT v. Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. in SLP (C) No. 23889 of 2003, the same was dismissed by this court on April 4, 2005. Leaving the question of law open, the appeals are dismissed.
DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.